Tuesday, January 11, 2005
Previous Posts
Disclaimer
This Blog does not create an attorney/client relationship
with you and does not provide specific legal advice to you or your company. Certain legal concepts have not been fully
developed and certain legal issues have been stated as fact for which arguments
can be made to the contrary, due to space constraints. It is provided for educational purposes
only. In addition, all participants,
including Paul Arne, other members of Morris, Manning & Martin, and all
those providing comments, may take positions that they do not fully endorse or
that their companies or law firms do not fully endorse, for the purpose of
exploring the legal and business issues discussed. No positions taken by any participant should
be viewed or asserted as his or her true belief or legal position.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

1 Comments:
They probably will. If open source licensing as defined by
OSI is not possible due to preemption difficulties then the
patent overture is simply empty rhetoric by IBM.
The proprietary world has little to risk if the patent
waiver is dependant upon the validity of the OSI license
definition.
http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf
"The pledge will benefit any Open Source Software. Open
Source Software is any computer software program whose
source code is published and available for inspection and
use by anyone, and is made available under a license
agreement that permits recipients to copy, modify and
distribute the program's source code without payment of fees
or royalties. All licenses certified by opensource.org and
listed on their website as of 01/11/2005 are Open Source
Software licenses for the purpose of this pledge.."
Post a Comment
<< Home