Friday, November 05, 2004
Previous Posts
Disclaimer
This Blog does not create an attorney/client relationship
with you and does not provide specific legal advice to you or your company. Certain legal concepts have not been fully
developed and certain legal issues have been stated as fact for which arguments
can be made to the contrary, due to space constraints. It is provided for educational purposes
only. In addition, all participants,
including Paul Arne, other members of Morris, Manning & Martin, and all
those providing comments, may take positions that they do not fully endorse or
that their companies or law firms do not fully endorse, for the purpose of
exploring the legal and business issues discussed. No positions taken by any participant should
be viewed or asserted as his or her true belief or legal position.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

1 Comments:
Analysts and journalists have played a key role in making open source a mainstream technology. They have done that by observing what's available, comparing it to alternatives, and telling clients the benefits and risks of possible decisions. Nothing magic going on here.
Open Source is not new (open source versions of UNIX have been around for a long time).
As always, when something new succeeds, it is because a number of things are available at the same time -- in this case big enough platforms, suitable software antecedents, and software programmers who were interested in trying out a new developoment model. It is the combination of things that made Open Source possible, rather than its mystical nature, that makes it valuable and may provide information on how to continue to support it.
Amy Wohl
www.wohl.com
Post a Comment
<< Home